Haven’t they even considered [list of things that have already been addressed]?
Don’t they realize that the real problem here is [the literal specific thing that the idea has been brought up to solve and that has been the central focus of discussion]?
And [idea that has just now
been
proposed for discussion] is so vague, it could very well do [exact opposite thing it’s meant to do]!
Anyway, it’s totally reactionary [according to the a series of uncharitable assumptions I’m making].
Just the other day on Twitter I saw someone talk about how so-called ‘rationalists’ must hate the poor because they never talk about universal basic income.
That’s pretty lulzy considering this chart:
But srsly tho, rationalists totally must hate bodily autonomy because I never see anyone loudly signaling pro-choice memes! The only views I ever actually observe being expressed are against abortion, or at least questioning it! Because that’s totally how it works right?!
ISFJ: please don’t ask them out unless you’re 100% sure they like you back. They’ll feel guilty and they’ll pity date you and it’ll be awful for everyone involved and their grandmother.
ISTJ: “what are your intentions? Are you serious about this? What are your plans for the future?”
ESFJ: Picky af. If you’re down for constant “adjustments” to your character and appearance then go for it.
ESTJ: Surprisingly shy when it comes to romance. Ask them out. Ask them and watch how they get all stuttery and red in the face. So cute…and hilarious. Please take pictures for me.
ISFP: The closest thing to an idealist without the wishy-washyness. Suckers for all things love. If you’re into gushy and sickeningly sweet, this is your match.
ISTP: Dating them is like being their best friend…with benefits. What are you waiting for?
ESFP: They’re often very popular and desirable. If you’re the jealous clingy type, spare yourself and the esfp and forget the whole thing.
ESTP: Okay first of all, don’t try to compete for their love because you’ll never be able to love them as much as they love themselves. Also, if you’re looking for consistency, look elsewhere.
INFP: They’ll love you for you. 100% genuine. But their feelings are very intense. These are deep waters, you sure you can swim well?
INFJ: These ones are surprisingly ambitious. If your plans don’t fit into their “vision”, just walk your separate ways. They might wind up loving you with all of their heart, but Ni comes first. It’s nothing personal.
ENFP: This is the guy/girl that made you question your sexuality, isn’t it? Well guess what? They’ll probably also be down for helping you “figure it out”. Seize the opportunity!
ENFJ: So hot. I totally get why you’re interested in them. They’re a walking, talking paradox though. Helloo, is it confusion you’re looking for?
INTP: Lmao. Okay try to befriend them first then we’ll talk. This one could take years. Good luck, you poor thing.
INTJ: If you want someone who’ll constantly express their undying love for you then please don’t bother them.
ENTP: Go ahead. They’re pretty easy going and down for whatever. And even if they turn you down, they’ll do it so smoothly you’ll wonder if it ever even happened.
ENTJ: If you actually manage to score this one then you’ve successfully found yourself a sugar daddy. Niiice.
….ouch.
?NT? here and 100% accurate, would get confirmation biased again 5/5
most people make it at about a fifth of the proper strength. if the mug isn’t at least half full with powder before you put the liquid in it’s not strong enough
anon was asking about the band, jesus
I seriously hope you mean the unsweetened powder because that’s the only correct one that is not for weaklings and wimps
Have discovered key advantage of judaism from @ilzolende - they hold their organised religion at a much more civilised time of dfay.
What time is that?
Allegedly 19:30 Fridays, although other sources have disputed this, or at least claimed it’s much more complicated.
19:30 Fridays at the local Temple Beth Reform Judaism.
It was “”“17:30 Fridays”“” (read: 17:50 Fridays) at the local Hillel when that was in session.
And apparently there are some magical synagogues that actually hold Saturday morning services at 10:00 or 10:30 every week.
Is that just the jewish IQ thing in effect or is judaism actually the Objectively Correct Religion because it has figured out the Objectively Correct Time to do religion at? I’m prepared to believe either…
Friends It Has Been Three Days Since Judaism Just Had A Religion Holiday That Was “Cheesecake-Fueled All-Nighter On A Saturday Night”*.
I Do Not Think This Is The Best Time To Be Talking About How Judaism Does Time Management Correctly.
(* Cheesecake depends on local custom. iirc almost all customs are something dairy-based.)
What do you mean “Cheesecake-Fueled All-Nighter On A Saturday Night” isn’t Correct Time Management? Because that totally sounds like Correct Time Management to me. (I mean, assuming the cheesecake is allowed to be vegan…)
Have discovered key advantage of judaism from @ilzolende - they hold their organised religion at a much more civilised time of dfay.
What time is that?
Allegedly 19:30 Fridays, although other sources have disputed this, or at least claimed it’s much more complicated.
19:30 Fridays at the local Temple Beth Reform Judaism.
It was “”“17:30 Fridays”“” (read: 17:50 Fridays) at the local Hillel when that was in session.
And apparently there are some magical synagogues that actually hold Saturday morning services at 10:00 or 10:30 every week.
Is that just the jewish IQ thing in effect or is judaism actually the Objectively Correct Religion because it has figured out the Objectively Correct Time to do religion at? I’m prepared to believe either…
Whoa, I didn’t realize that it was so deliberate, I honestly thought it was unconscious
Scary, scary.
I remember one time, my mother got me a scarf and I told her I’d rather have had the money and she got so angry. Since nobody has ever gotten disappointed that their gift was rejected, I can conclude she was not offering me a gift but was merely planning to strangle me.
But srsly tho, giving non-money gifts is economically inefficient unless it’s one of the following situations:
You are able to provide something that money can’t normally buy
You are able to suggest something that better matches the person’s preferences than what they would have thought to buy themselves
You are able to obtain something for substantially less than the market price of equivalent value
Thus, I personally think there are essentially four valid gifts: company, crafts, cuddles, and currency.
Productive capital in the form of a sewing machine.
And not just any sewing machine, but an old one from before planned obsolescence was invented. A heavy noisy indestructible machine from the early 70′s with exactly 3 plastic parts.
I was informed that the machine has been working excellently for four decades, but once those parts break it’ll be gone.
I informed the person about the existence of a phenomenon known as 3d-printing.
It’s fascinating how sufficiently new technology gives new life to sufficiently old technology.
Old-time values were crap but they did know how to make some material things properly.
It has no fancy electronic operating systems or insecure Internet of Shit features. Just mechanical goodness.
If I’m going to have it controlled by a computer, it’ll be running a custom set of servos and shit anyway.
And because it has maintenance hatches revealing access to all the parts, and easy aparttakeability and repairability and con- and outfigureability alike, I’m probably going to have a braingasm when I figure out what exact kind of a Babbagean engine it has outputting the fancy sewing patterns. Because it has them.
This is a perfect hacker sewing machine. One might say it’s the Thinkpad of sewing machines.
(Another thing it has in common with Thinkpads: lugging around four of these will hurt your back, and is not recommended.)
These particular things are pretty much impossible to find on the market; they are known to be so excellent that nobody is willing to give them up.
I pre-inherited one, which is the best form of inheriting because nobody has to die. Nepotism yay!
(This is a good sewing machine, but I’m not convinced it’s quite worth anyone dying over. It does get closer than most things, but nah.
(Or, when I think about it, if someone were to try to expropriate my sewing machine as a piece of productive capital owned by a corporation, it would be worth that someone dying over.))
Gotta see if you can get it to work with punchcards tho
(I know that’s not a sewing machine, but close enough)
FUCK
NOW I’M GOING TO BE THINKING ALL NIGHT ABOUT THE SPECIFIC SETUP OF CAMS AND GEARS AND SHIT THAT WOULD TOTALLY MAKE IT RUN ON PUNCHCARDS
Productive capital in the form of a sewing machine.
And not just any sewing machine, but an old one from before planned obsolescence was invented. A heavy noisy indestructible machine from the early 70′s with exactly 3 plastic parts.
I was informed that the machine has been working excellently for four decades, but once those parts break it’ll be gone.
I informed the person about the existence of a phenomenon known as 3d-printing.
It’s fascinating how sufficiently new technology gives new life to sufficiently old technology.
Old-time values were crap but they did know how to make some material things properly.
It has no fancy electronic operating systems or insecure Internet of Shit features. Just mechanical goodness.
If I’m going to have it controlled by a computer, it’ll be running a custom set of servos and shit anyway.
And because it has maintenance hatches revealing access to all the parts, and easy aparttakeability and repairability and con- and outfigureability alike, I’m probably going to have a braingasm when I figure out what exact kind of a Babbagean engine it has outputting the fancy sewing patterns. Because it has them.
This is a perfect hacker sewing machine. One might say it’s the Thinkpad of sewing machines.
(Another thing it has in common with Thinkpads: lugging around four of these will hurt your back, and is not recommended.)
These particular things are pretty much impossible to find on the market; they are known to be so excellent that nobody is willing to give them up.
I pre-inherited one, which is the best form of inheriting because nobody has to die. Nepotism yay!
(This is a good sewing machine, but I’m not convinced it’s quite worth anyone dying over. It does get closer than most things, but nah.
(Or, when I think about it, if someone were to try to expropriate my sewing machine as a piece of productive capital owned by a corporation, it would be worth that someone dying over.))
