promethea.incorporated

brave and steely-eyed and morally pure and a bit terrifying… /testimonials /evil /leet .ask? .ask_long?


shlevy:

While you live in my house, you’ll follow my rules!

I won’t let you choose another place to live, even if the people who own it are willing. My house, my rules!

I’ll strictly control what skills you develop and resources you amass that are relevant to being able to live on your own. My house, my rules!

I’ll deny permissions legally required to get a license or a job that I don’t want you to get. My house, my rules!

If you manage to get out of the house anyway, I’ll call on the government to force you to come back. My house, my rules!

Seriously, this is some of the creepiest shit in the US, along with the private prisons.

The government basically enforces something very close to slavery for minors, even going as far as to explicitly allow assaulting and torturing and kidnapping them and protects the abusers from consequences with violent force. That’s some shit that shouldn’t ever fly anywhere.

At least our nordic nanny states technically ban assaulting one’s child, even if it isn’t that enforced. For all their restrictions on people’s freedom, they at least apply them also to those who are the most likely and inevitably in positions of illegitimate and coercive authority.

(via shieldfoss)

3 weeks ago · tagged #youth rights #abuse cw #every sin begins from treating people as product · 151 notes · source: shlevy · .permalink


blashimov:

osnes:

Meet my cousin Sarah. At 17, her future looks bright. She is in the top 10% of her class, runs cross-country and belongs to the National Honor Society and the debate team.  She is also gay.  Like any high school kids in a relationship, Sarah and her girlfriend wanted to go to prom together.  But when they did that, Sarah’s parents, who believe that homosexuality is a sin and abnormal, sent Sarah away against her will to an East Texas Christian boarding facility for troubled teens to “pray away the gay.”

Not only does this type of “therapy” not work, mental health professionals from organizations like the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have found it to be psychologically damaging, especially for minors.  And Sarah has been told that she must stay in this facility for a whole year.  So instead of being surrounded by friends and extended family who love and support Sarah for who she is, she’ll be isolated in a place where the fact that she is gay is treated as a sin and an illness. Instead of preparing for college and competing in the state debate tournament, she’ll be doing forced labor every day and enduring Bible-based “therapy” for her “disease.”

She is not allowed phone calls or email or any form of computer communication.  She is also not allowed visitors and cannot leave the property.   She is completely cut off from the outside world. She tried to run away, but was caught by the staff and returned to the facility.



Sarah’s extended family and close friends are trying to win her release through the legal system, but it’s not cheap.  Attorney’s fees in the first few weeks have already exceeded $20,000, and they are continuing to mount, with a full hearing set for July.  Sarah needs your help.  But this is about more than just one gay kid – if we free Sarah we can help show that it’s not okay to try to make gay teens straight by sending them away and using the threat of God against them.



Spread the word so being gay doesn’t mean losing freedom for Sarah. #savesarah.”

DONATE & if you can’t, please make sure to reblog if possible.

@michaelblume relevant to your interests? 

It seems unfortunate that one has 0 rights to anything but food shelter and medical care (if that) before turning 18. 

If I was the CEO of Dawn Defense, yeah I’d stage a rescue raid against that facility, pro bono.

(via multiheaded1793)

3 weeks ago · tagged #every sin begins from treating people as product #abuse cw · 23,984 notes · .permalink


50-Year Study Finds Spanking Doesn't Work

(sacramento.cbslocal.com)

dagny-hashtaggart:

noctis-nova:

transpanpat:

eltigrechico:

SHOCKER!! Turns out that small and vulnerable children being physically attacked by the large and strong adults they most love and trust in this world has negative effects. Who knew?

also, thanks to @thedoomreport for this link

I’m adding onto this by providing the PDF of the actual study (thanks to still being able to access the journal post-graduation) and uploaded it to google docs here 

So if you want the exact source, it is there (and without paying a dime and you can download it as well!!

Stop hitting kids.

This is a really interesting piece of research. Cursory inspection of the source looks favorable to me; I can’t see any obvious problems with study design or unjustified conclusions. I’d be curious to hear if anyone sees things worth criticizing about it, but so far I don’t. (It is worth noting that the term ‘50-year study’ in the headline is misleading: this wasn’t a 50-year longitudinal study, it was a meta-analysis of 50 years of other studies.)

What the study found, in sum: there were no significant long-term benefits to spanking; the only factor on which it produced positive effects was short-term compliance. That’s not really news as far as the state of the field; few studies have found long-term beneficial effects associated with light corporal punishment, and when they do those effects are minor. What’s more novel is that this establishes a strong correlation between spanking and bad long-term outcomes in terms of criminality, aggression, mental illness, etc. We’ve known for awhile now that child abuse and heavy corporal punishment (anything involving an implement, e.g.) is strongly correlated with problems later in life, but to date studies on light corporal punishment, considered individually, have been more equivocal. Across the meta-analysis, however, it’s pretty clear that there’s a strong correlation between spanking and negative outcomes. It’s not as strong as with heavy punishment, but it’s not much weaker (effect size of .25 and .38, respectively). In other words, we’re likely looking at a fairly linear relationship between severity of punishment and severity of long-term negative outcomes.

The causal relationship is somewhat more difficult to ascertain: the authors leave open the possibility that the causal relationship could be reversed, i.e. children with the most long-term issues get the most spanking, which doesn’t have a substantial effect one way or the other on those issues. The authors give several good statistical reasons to see spanking > mental/social problems as the substantially more likely causal sequence, but acknowledge that none of them constitute definitive proof. Still, all in all this evidence makes a pretty solid case for avoiding even light corporal punishment in disciplining children.

(via metagorgon)

3 weeks ago · tagged #abuse cw · 16,973 notes · source: eltigrechico · .permalink


dickslapthestate:
“ harmonic-motion:
“ mistletoe-fucker:
“ socialjusticeprincesses:
“ ima-fuckingt4ble:
“ ranting-rose:
“ dickslapthestate:
“ ranting-rose:
“ ittybittykittykisses:
“ ranting-rose:
“ vgcgraveyard:
“ caitallolovesyou:
“...

dickslapthestate:

harmonic-motion:

mistletoe-fucker:

socialjusticeprincesses:

ima-fuckingt4ble:

ranting-rose:

dickslapthestate:

ranting-rose:

ittybittykittykisses:

ranting-rose:

vgcgraveyard:

caitallolovesyou:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

lazyhat:

I was pretty skeptical about the figures, since they contradict what I usually hear on the media, so I did a little research. Here’s what I found: 
(Sorry this is so US centric) 
(I’ll also try to stay close to primary sources as possible)

(http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm?s_cid=ss6308a1_e)

- the 12 months before taking the survey, an estimated 4.0% of women experienced some form of physical violence by an intimate partner
-an estimated 14.2% of women experienced some form of psychological aggression in the 12 months preceding the survey.
-*4,774,000 women have been victims of physical violence by intimate partner in the 12 months preceding the survey
-*17,091,000 women have been victims of psychological aggression by intimate partner in the 12 months preceding the survey

- the 12 months before taking the survey, an estimated 4.8% of men experienced some form of physical violence by an intimate partner
-an estimated 18.0% of men experienced some form of psychological aggression in the 12 months preceding the survey.
-*5,452,000 men have been victims of physical violence by intimate partner in the 12 months preceding the survey
-*20,471,000 men have been victims of psychological aggression by intimate partner in the 12 months preceding the survey

*Table 6

By the data presented by the Center for Disease Control, out of the estimate of 10,226,000 yearly victims of intimate partner violence, 53.3% of victims where male and 46.6% were female. As for psychological aggression, out of the estimate of 37,562,000 yearly victims, 54.4% were male and 45.5% were female. These statistics would support the claim made in the bottom left.

Now I couldn’t find a primary source for the 70% of DV is initiated by women, but here’s the facts that I found, which may have been interpreted by the people who made this poster:

(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/glenn-sacks/researcher-says-womens-in_b_222746.html)
-Women who were in a battered women’s shelter, 67% of the women reported severe violence toward their partner in the past year.

This can be interpreted as “67% of violent couples with IPV is mutual”. But then again, primary sources and full data would be helpful to back up this claim.

But the one that is most interesting is:(http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/newsArticle.aspx?articleid=111137)(Another report analysis from the CDC)

-23.9% of relationships are violent
-50.3% of IPV is non-reciprocal and 49.7% is reciprocal (Reciprocal IPV= Mutual violence)
-70.7% of non-reciprocal IPV is initiated by women. 

So summing up the numbers, it’s not that 70% of all DV is initiated by women, its that 70% of non-reciprocal DV is initiated by women. To go further would say that 49.7% of DV is mutual, 36.2% of DV is initiated by women, and 14.5% of DV is initiated by men

Male victims of domestic violence are real. They are hurting. And they often don’t get the attention and compassion they so urgently deserve and need.

Have a heart. Open your mind, and give a care.

Hm. These numbers are all so different to anything I’ve seen before. I’m reblogging and liking this both for my own reference and to spread these numbers to others. I’m definitely gonna look into this and see if I can find more sources and more information.

Mother fuckers can we all just say let’s not be dicks to our fucking love ones already?

Tagging this for my speech project that I need the sources for

Here are 221 studies on IPV / DV for y’all.

You are a life saver.

That list is good, but outdated.  I e-mailed the researcher who compiled that list a couple weeks ago and he gave me three different documents.  I uploaded them to this dropbox folder. You can go there and download them.

The list of studies is now up to 343 scholarly investigations (270 empirical studies and 73 reviews). Not only did he send me that list, but he also sent me two meta-studies (also in the dropbox folder).  One is on male/female perpetration rates and the other is on male/female victimization rates. 

There is also “Rates of Bi-directional versus Uni-directional Intimate Partner Violence Across Samples, Sexual Orientations, and Race/Ethnicities: A Comprehensive Review“.  It’s a mouthful to be sure. Basically this study took the data from 48 other empirical studies, collated the data, placed it online for public viewing, submitted it for peer review, and was found to be accurate. 

It’s findings basically wind down to this:

  • 84% of relationships are non-violent
  • 58% of relationships that are violent, both partners abuse the other.
  • 28% of violent relationships only the woman is violent
  • 14% of violent relationships only the man is violent.

This is featured Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project website and is part of a much larger DV research project.  You can read the summarized findings here or take a gander at the full 61-page review.  This is a compilation of the research of Erin Pizzey, Murray Strauss, Don Dutton, and many others who are challenging the feminist model of patriarchal dominance. They also have some videos that are very informative as well.

Murray Strauss also compiled: Thirty Years of Denying the Evidence on Gender Symmetry in Partner Violence: Implications for Prevention and Treatment A report detailing the existence of over 200 studies showing gender symmetry in victimization rates. Studies that show symmetry going as far back as 1975.  He also examines the methods feminist researchers have used to suppress the evidence from public discourse, hence the title “Thirty Years of Denying the Evidence”.

Two other excellent and brief videos on the topic come from the MenAreGood YouTube channel:

Male Victims of Domestic Violence - The Hidden Story

Bias Against Men and Boys in Mental Health Research

I really need to write up a solo reference post for domestic violence data…

You are also a life saver.

This is so important

Reblogging since this is a huge list of scholarly sources. Am poking through some of these and it’s a fucking huge list.

- Mod Kuzco

this is very important, so i’m abstaining from fallout for a bit to bring this to everyone’s attention.

Coincidentally, I was reading earlier today that most men who are repeated victims of abuse learn NOT to call the police because THEY’Re usually the ones who end up being arrested.

This is true.  It’s actually been studied before and this was the result:

The men in the survey who called the police found them to be “very helpful” in only 19% of cases, and “not at all helpful” in 50% of cases. More importantly, when an abused man called the police, the police were more likely to arrest him than to arrest his abusive female partner. The men who called the police were arrested in 26% of cases, whereas their abusive partners were arrested in only 17%. Half the time the police arrested nobody, despite the abuse, and in 8% of the cases they arrested both the abuser and the victim. In those cases where the police did identify the abused man’s female partner as the aggressor, in 29% of cases, they refused to arrest the abusive woman. In 39% of these cases they said that there was nothing they could do and left.

This is relevant for my interests. It might also be relevant for some others’ interests to know that Influential Feminists™ consider these relevant for their interests.

(via metagorgon)

2 months ago · tagged #abuse cw #domestic abuse cw #steel feminism · 21,617 notes · .permalink