promethea.incorporated

brave and steely-eyed and morally pure and a bit terrifying… /testimonials /evil /leet .ask? .ask_long?


shlevy:

While you live in my house, you’ll follow my rules!

I won’t let you choose another place to live, even if the people who own it are willing. My house, my rules!

I’ll strictly control what skills you develop and resources you amass that are relevant to being able to live on your own. My house, my rules!

I’ll deny permissions legally required to get a license or a job that I don’t want you to get. My house, my rules!

If you manage to get out of the house anyway, I’ll call on the government to force you to come back. My house, my rules!

Seriously, this is some of the creepiest shit in the US, along with the private prisons.

The government basically enforces something very close to slavery for minors, even going as far as to explicitly allow assaulting and torturing and kidnapping them and protects the abusers from consequences with violent force. That’s some shit that shouldn’t ever fly anywhere.

At least our nordic nanny states technically ban assaulting one’s child, even if it isn’t that enforced. For all their restrictions on people’s freedom, they at least apply them also to those who are the most likely and inevitably in positions of illegitimate and coercive authority.

(via shieldfoss)

3 weeks ago · tagged #youth rights #abuse cw #every sin begins from treating people as product · 151 notes · source: shlevy · .permalink

  1. ozylikes reblogged this from ilzolende
  2. raginrayguns said: Finally read this post after seeing only the top line a while ago. I’d assumed it was going to be venting about your mother in law leaving the sponge in the sink, and got progressively more confused as I read
  3. almostcoralchaos reblogged this from shlevy
  4. socialjusticemunchkin reblogged this from shlevy and added:
    I mean “it resembles” in the way that it seems to have something similar; not that it’s actually that much about the...
  5. randomizedred reblogged this from artisticmanga
  6. shlevy reblogged this from socialjusticemunchkin and added:
    … I mean if you’re going to go with negative vs positive rights at all then you’ve basically abolished the entire...
  7. witandmirth reblogged this from socialjusticemunchkin
  8. metagorgon said: this is about the caretaker’s interests in the child’s decision, not the caretaker’s own interests.
  9. artisticmanga reblogged this from bookchins-revenge
  10. supersonichistrionic reblogged this from bookchins-revenge
  11. bookchins-revenge reblogged this from socialjusticemunchkin
  12. ilzolende reblogged this from socialjusticemunchkin and added:
    OTOH, the party whose interests are most relevant is also typically significantly cognitively impaired, has atypically...
  13. shacklesburst reblogged this from ilzolende
  14. isaacfhtagn reblogged this from shlevy
  15. cyborgbutterflies reblogged this from earthboundricochet
  16. crowmeme reblogged this from vulpineangel
  17. vulpineangel reblogged this from dagothcares