promethea.incorporated

brave and steely-eyed and morally pure and a bit terrifying… /testimonials /evil /leet .ask? .ask_long?


oligopsony:
“matt-ruins-feminisms-shit:
“ friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:
“ cisnowflake:
“ Remember, if a man gets a woman pregnant and he doesn’t want that kid it’s his responsibility anyway. If she wants to keep it, he’s fucked. He needs to pay...

oligopsony:

matt-ruins-feminisms-shit:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

cisnowflake:

Remember, if a man gets a woman pregnant and he doesn’t want that kid it’s his responsibility anyway. If she wants to keep it, he’s fucked. He needs to pay even if he was tricked into fatherhood. If he doesn’t pay he goes to jail. He shoulda kept it in his pants, amiright?

If a woman gets pregnant, gives birth, and doesn’t want the kid there’s a box she can drop the baby into and she’s immediately relieved of all responsibility. She never even has to tell the father because fuck that dude. He doesn’t have a right to his spawn unless she wants that sweet sweet child support check.

*Equality*

Hey, this is an option that might discourage some abortion. I say good.

I don’t think anyone is saying it’s a bad idea, it’s certainly better than a dumpster. It just shows you only have options if you are the mother.

But that’s already taking it for granted (accurately, mind) that the mother is the one stuck with the baby if neither party wants it. A man can throw a baby in a baby box as easily as a woman. Go ahead, try it! (Do not actually try this.)

No he can’t, because the state will send men with guns to ransom or kidnap him if the baby’s mother is known and is on board with the “kidnapping and/or ransom” plan instead of the “put baby in box” plan.

If we as a society want babies to be taken care of, we give money to them (for use by their parents/guardians for their benefit) instead of ransoming people based on the copenhagen interpretation of ethics (your gametes were involved, it’s your responsibility now kthxbye). Or if we want to enforce contracts of “yeah, I totally will support you with the baby” then we should actually require such contracts to be consensually established instead of assuming that sex is inevitably implied consent to such with no way out even if participants explicitly agree.

We wouldn’t force people to take the risk of having to marry just for having sex, and consider those who try to enforce such things to be utter barbarians, so why would we expose people to the risk of losing substantial amounts of money for 18 years as the price of having sex?

(via oligopsony-deactivated20160508)

1 month ago · tagged #steel feminism · 660 notes · source: cisnowflake · .permalink

  1. luckyjude23 reblogged this from fucking-egg-by-gordon-ramsey
  2. pumpkabooie reblogged this from cisnowflake
  3. mraws0m3 reblogged this from cisnowflake
  4. thej-key reblogged this from feminist-bullshit and added:
    There was research going into a pill for men, but last I had heard the funding was cut due to protests from feminists…
  5. juhmeez reblogged this from cisnowflake
  6. slurke202 reblogged this from cisnowflake
  7. blacknwhite23 reblogged this from cisnowflake and added:
    :/
  8. imtalkingtothemoon2100 reblogged this from cisnowflake
  9. pwettysparklekitten reblogged this from cisnowflake and added:
    OK I understand your point, but isn’t it kinda better than many alternatives? Like people neglect, abuse, kill, etc....
  10. steprhia reblogged this from cisnowflake
  11. fucking-egg-by-gordon-ramsey reblogged this from cisnowflake
  12. feminismiscancerandsoisislam reblogged this from cisnowflake
  13. neonbushes reblogged this from kissmyprivilege
  14. shinxanta reblogged this from cisnowflake
  15. pink-prostitute reblogged this from cisnowflake
  16. cryingfortaramaclay reblogged this from cisnowflake and added:
    This isnt about the women. Its about saving the babies. Instead of dumpsters, theres a safe place
  17. cisnowflake posted this