And we wouldn’t need to worry about bathroom laws if the state had no right to intrude into bathrooms in the first place.
While technically true, decentralized oppression and nonsense about bathrooms can still exist without a state to sanction it – in fact, given the limited ability of the state to police every public bathroom, we can dismiss the laws as the ruse they are, a formal mask on the informal social anxiety about the subject. And that is what is really at the heart of the matter.
Yes. My point exactly. Such decentralized oppression can’t exactly be addressed by the state, but the oppression of PoliceMob bullying trans women on top of that can be, by reducing the things it’s acceptable for PoliceMob to intrude to. We can’t have PoliceMob kidnap all the cissexists even if we wanted to, so removing the state’s ability to create these laws in one direction or the other would be a win for the “less oppression and bullying” side. Then we’d only have to deal with the cissexists, instead of cissexists + PoliceMob + cissexists again because they are butthurt about the state legalizing gay marriage and are looking for targets to take out their frustration on.
2 months ago · 3 notes · source: 2centjubilee · .permalink
henrysartain liked this
zeteticelench liked this
socialjusticemunchkin reblogged this from 2centjubilee and added:Yes. My point exactly. Such decentralized oppression can’t exactly be addressed by the state, but the oppression of...
2centjubilee posted this