promethea.incorporated

brave and steely-eyed and morally pure and a bit terrifying… /testimonials /evil /leet .ask? .ask_long?


slatestarscratchpad:

I usually try not to be the kind of rationalist who is like “my superior powers of deduction have determined after five minutes of study that all world experts are wrong about this issue”.

But my superior powers of deduction have determined after five minutes of study that all the media sources and Bitcoin experts reporting that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto are wrong, and I’m willing to put like 90% probability on that.

Isn’t this the exact same guy who was almost-proven to be a fraud like in December or something? The one who wanted to make up some money to evade tax authorities, who used algorithms not invented in 2009 for something supposedly from 2009 etc.?

2 months ago · 41 notes · source: slatestarscratchpad · .permalink

  1. conductivemithril reblogged this from slatestarscratchpad and added:
    You’re taking bets in Bitcoin, right?
  2. sysice reblogged this from slatestarscratchpad and added:
    I mean, the experts I’ve heard from have said it’s an obvious fake. I don’t have a hundredth of the experience I would...
  3. voidfraction reblogged this from theungrumpablegrinch and added:
    All the people I consider genuine crypto experts think it’s a fraud. I’d say the takeaway from this should be that...
  4. jack-v reblogged this from slatestarscratchpad and added:
    I don’t want to extrapolate from one data point, but according to Twitter, he claimed to be Satoshi last year as well,...
  5. theungrumpablegrinch reblogged this from slatestarscratchpad and added:
    I’d go 95%.
  6. nightpool said: wait “all the bitcoin experts”? my twitter feed (which is mostly notable software security names) is just 100% people making fun of Craig Wright today.
  7. multiheaded1793 said: “My common sense is tingling.”
  8. slatestarscratchpad posted this