promethea.incorporated

brave and steely-eyed and morally pure and a bit terrifying… /testimonials /evil /leet .ask? .ask_long?


wirehead-wannabe:

@voximperatoris @socialjusticemunchkin @argumate and everyone else in the conversation on zoning laws and libertarianism:

A big part of this is that there are heavy transaction costs and network effects implicit in any attempt to move to a better city. It’s not like buying a car where I can just decide that my current one is a piece of junk and get something more reliable. I’m looking to build a lifelong home, ideally, and if I were to have kids I would potentially want to build a multigenerational home. I also want to live near my friends, etc. I’m not exactly sure how this all works out (maybe it ends up being an argument in favor of libertarianism, even) but I don’t see it talked about a whole lot.

I’m not expecting the transition to the hypothetical utopia to work in reality, unless you’re willing to move to the bottom of the sea or something. Laissez-faireizing existing cities to be less restrictive on zoning (something like the japanese approach, combined with simple height limits of 45° from the opposite edge of the streets as a default, instead of horrible euclidian bullshit) is the pragmatic approach. Dirty and disgusting, but pragmatic.

2 months ago · 13 notes · source: wirehead-wannabe · .permalink

  1. drethelin reblogged this from wirehead-wannabe
  2. jbeshir reblogged this from voximperatoris and added:
    Noticing a connection to other stuff talked about recently, it’s notable how this “local decisions plus centralised...
  3. voximperatoris reblogged this from wirehead-wannabe and added:
    Yes, I think transaction costs are the major problem.And I think libertarian policy helps address it by turning “if you...
  4. socialjusticemunchkin reblogged this from wirehead-wannabe and added:
    I’m not expecting the transition to the hypothetical utopia to work in reality, unless you’re willing to move to the...
  5. wirehead-wannabe posted this