promethea.incorporated

brave and steely-eyed and morally pure and a bit terrifying… /testimonials /evil /leet .ask? .ask_long?


wirehead-wannabe:

Do any of the transhumanists in the room have a non-handwavey solution to overpopulation? I still haven’t seen one.

One solution would be to universally agree that the resources of the universe shall be split among each currently living person and everyone’s descendants, forks etc. shall only be allowed to access those allocated to their ancestor-at-the-time-of-splitting or voluntarily reallocated to them by their owners. Defectors will get destroyed.

It would be totally unfair to the innocent children of several generations of transhuman Quiverfulls, driven to subsistence level while those who don’t have any children enjoy unimaginable wealth and that’s the entire point. It would directly incentivize keeping one’s descendants as few as possible because maintaining a larger population requires more food/space/whatever just for survival, which is then not available for other productive uses, and minds that have greater per capita resources available can grow larger; one human is smarter than the equivalent carrying capacity consumption in rodents, and a single planet-sized computronium brain is smarter than the same planet tiled with individual ems.

This would mean that as long as the resource boundaries are initially enforced long enough to solidify such differences, the breeders can’t catch up and will most likely be the ones who get wiped out if the agreement is broken. Therefore posthumans would be incentivized to be growers instead of breeders, but also to maintain the balance as a long-term survival plan if they nonetheless are breeders.

If we growers initially outgun breeders, we can unilaterally enforce this if we can cooperate until the incentive landscape turns around; and thanks to transhuman decision-theoretic reasons our commitment to maintain that deal, even when it would be in our own interests to break it, can be trusted.

3 months ago · tagged #kind of quick speculation #extrapolated from my plan for countries immigration and population growth #but seems superficially sound at least · 37 notes · source: wirehead-wannabe · .permalink

  1. thegirlfromjakku reblogged this from zestynuggets and added:
    The world can maintain about 6 and a half billion humans we could maybe go all the way to 8 or 9 with maximized...
  2. bessibel reblogged this from lezbongs
  3. lezbongs reblogged this from gaycomputerwitchcraft
  4. academicianzex reblogged this from yxoque and added:
    It’s not really a problem? Too lazy to look it up but birth rates went from like 6.0 per woman in 1950 to 2.5 today and...
  5. yxoque reblogged this from oliwhail and added:
    It comes down to (roughly, I don’t know how to calculate projected populations properly) an additional 5 billion peoples...
  6. crazyeddieme reblogged this from wirehead-wannabe
  7. tahramis reblogged this from asciiheart and added:
    people are also pretty poorly distributed too, but if we all stood shoulder to shoulder, we could all fit within the LA...
  8. oliwhail reblogged this from yxoque and added:
    #If I’m not mistaken immortality would take quite a while to make an impact on population numbersWould you mind...
  9. gaycomputerwitchcraft reblogged this from asciiheart and added:
    malthus was a racist. malthusian gloom is racist. the population myth by murray bookchin is worth a read.
  10. zestynuggets reblogged this from asciiheart and added:
    I will agree the distribution of goods is totally skewed on a worldwide basis, however there are other factors involved....
  11. asciiheart reblogged this from yxoque and added:
    overpopulation is not a problem? the world population is gonna plateau in a few decades, and we have enough space and...
  12. socialjusticemunchkin reblogged this from wirehead-wannabe and added:
    One solution would be to universally agree that the resources of the universe shall be split among each currently living...
  13. wirehead-wannabe reblogged this from voximperatoris and added:
    “I’m saying that if there’s some kind of gradual genetic drift towards some kind of psychology of ultra-natalism, that...
  14. voximperatoris reblogged this from wirehead-wannabe and added:
    I’m not at all assuming that people’s psychological makeup will necessarily stay the same in the future.I’m saying that...
  15. red880 reblogged this from wirehead-wannabe and added:
    Is “space colonization” handwavey?