promethea.incorporated

brave and steely-eyed and morally pure and a bit terrifying… /testimonials /evil /leet .ask? .ask_long?


theunitofcaring:

so there’s this article arguing that feminists ought to focus some energy and effort on interventions in developing countries, as small allocations of resources can do a lot to improve the lives of women (and fight gender inequality) there, and that it’s a shortcoming of current feminist praxis that those problems are neglected in favor of attention-grabbing but much less tractable ones that mostly affect wealthy women.

the first response:

The author does not seem to understand the point of feminism. The reason that “tractable and important problems affecting poor women in poor countries” are not on the feminist agenda, is that they generally affect men to a similar degree. <…> Feminism is not simply about harm suffered by women, it about harm caused by an oppressive relationship of men to women. So feminists don’t protest against earthquakes, which kill thousands of women every year, because there is nothing gender-specific in an earthquake. Pornography, on the other hand, is very strongly gender-specific: most of it depicts women, in a way that feminists consider to be a harm, and it is largely made by men, for the benefit of men

The response is some of the deepest bullshit I’ve seen in quite some time. Even working from the assumption that feminism means reducing inequality instead of harm, material improvement in poor people’s situations tends to be really good at resulting in such effects. Also, #notmyfeminism on the pornography argument; it’s nowhere near that simple, especially when access to porn seems to be pretty good in reducing many harms feminists care about.

Also, Paul sounds like a person who’s male with a quite high probability. A male person is using intersectionality to argue that feminists shouldn’t focus on people with a lot of intersecting oppressions and instead do all kinds of wrong-headed stuff that’s way less effective and focuses on women with fewer intersecting oppressions. That’s about as fractally wrong as one can get and I can’t even

(via sdhs-rationalist)

3 months ago · tagged #steel feminism #i don't even know which specific genre of bullshit this falls into · 130 notes · source: theunitofcaring · .permalink

  1. herskyofdiamonds reblogged this from theunitofcaring
  2. veronicastraszh reblogged this from barrydeutsch
  3. barrydeutsch reblogged this from theunitofcaring and added:
    I don’t understand why it’s desirable to frame things this way? There’s a lot of things in the budget other than...
  4. mugasofer reblogged this from ozylikes
  5. theungrumpablegrinch reblogged this from ozylikes
  6. hotmario reblogged this from ozylikes
  7. femme-werewolf reblogged this from ozylikes and added:
    I am a feminist and I don’t think that opinion is particularly common among feminists. Mainstream feminist groups do...
  8. ozylikes reblogged this from ilzolende
  9. almostcoralchaos reblogged this from theunitofcaring
  10. flying-elliska reblogged this from gruntledandhinged
  11. compassionisobligatory reblogged this from theunitofcaring and added:
    I certainly don’t think you’re a monster. Most likely you and others like you are saints.But I still think that we do...
  12. mortiferamorphasmus reblogged this from cyborgbutterflies
  13. cyborgbutterflies reblogged this from theunitofcaring
  14. extra-penguin reblogged this from warpedellipsis
  15. tante-bete reblogged this from gruntledandhinged
  16. warpedellipsis reblogged this from waystatus and added:
    And that last couch thing is a lot of the problem I have with libertarians, too. “You can survive without that,...
  17. waystatus reblogged this from gruntledandhinged
  18. parentheticalreference reblogged this from gruntledandhinged
  19. iblogidieiblogagain reblogged this from gruntledandhinged
  20. gruntledandhinged reblogged this from barrydeutsch
  21. cromulentenough reblogged this from theunitofcaring
  22. theunitofcaring posted this