1. calmassthetic liked this
  2. catserla reblogged this from saltfishandbake
  3. catserla liked this
  4. question-paso liked this
  5. its-ya-boi-adam said: But examine them and actually try to see if there’s a way these can be changed so that the room for error is reduced greatly. Sometimes any change can be good change. This country can be beautiful and safe again if we work together instead of bickering.
  6. alloof reblogged this from colourful-crayons95
  7. alloof liked this
  8. alpha-bitch-witch reblogged this from colourful-crayons95
  9. randomcitizen2004 liked this
  10. foreverlostlostlost liked this
  11. palaswagger-tm87 liked this
  12. its-ya-boi-adam said: Someone tries to break into your homes and hurt your family. But that’s where we look at things. We were given this right at the end of a war with our previous government. This right was given incase we were to be invaded so that people could protect themselves or in case the government became too powerful. Yes you should be allowed to own a gun in your own home. That’s a given. But public carry and concealed carry need to be looked at a bit more. Not saying remove them.
  13. humanywumany23 reblogged this from allteenrelate
  14. recklesssamelove reblogged this from camelaanderson
  15. kimthewhim liked this
  16. putyourmoon-inmysun reblogged this from saltfishandbake
  17. liecmotnaph reblogged this from certifiedmail
  18. usuckbawls liked this
  19. emlulu reblogged this from allteenrelate
  20. ravenclawencyclopedia reblogged this from aria-lerendeair
  21. its-ya-boi-adam said: As stated previously. I can see both sides of the arguments. But with the state of affairs America is in right now. There needs to be more regulation. The big bad government doesn’t want to take your guns. Gun control and regulation is a touchy subject where you need to pick and choose your battles. Not everybody needs to be a super gun nut who owns 10 different weapons all loaded constantly on edge and paranoid. But not everyone needs to be disarmed because God forbid
  22. idcils liked this
  23. usuckbawls reblogged this from allteenrelate
  24. jfcdude liked this
  25. freedancespirit reblogged this from allteenrelate
  26. ohsomuchstuff reblogged this from moodleyoodley
  27. halfbeforehalfway reblogged this from honemizu
  28. katatak426 reblogged this from yasminasaur
  29. vulturevomittm reblogged this from dauntlessraconteuse
  30. theviolinist228 reblogged this from allteenrelate
  31. its-ya-boi-adam said: Happen if a teacher were to fly off the handle at a student and brandish said firearm as a way to threaten said child. Another extreme example but why take the chance. Clubs: these are gun free for a very smart reason. Do you really want a building full of rowdy drunk and uncontrollable people to be brandishing and carrying loaded firearms. If anything letting them have guns would only increase violence.
  32. angelicient reblogged this from allteenrelate
  33. angelicient liked this
  34. my-temporary-infinity liked this
  35. stjimmyisdead reblogged this from galaxysnail
  36. breadhumans liked this
  37. iusedtounderstand reblogged this from allteenrelate
  38. squirreltidings reblogged this from suits-n-criminals
  39. yeahimprettyawesome reblogged this from allteenrelate
  40. genevacnwy liked this
  41. its-ya-boi-adam said: Invites more people making it easier to get closer to the counter or do more damage. Now onto school zones: you want to arm children? Children? A lot of people actually want this. Now. Maybe someone else’s kid is not well behaved and decides “this other kid took my toy, I should shoot him” granted that’s an extreme example but why even take the chance. Now teachers on the other hand. That’s a double edged sword. There are great teachers out there but God knows what would
  42. nonbinary-nat liked this
  43. mursmeagle reblogged this from saltfishandbake
  44. camelaanderson reblogged this from infectedwiththecumbers
  45. sreymomo liked this
  46. suits-n-criminals reblogged this from findchaos
  47. lifeoftheinternet liked this
  48. its-ya-boi-adam said: And finally onto people stating that gun free zones are the issue and that no place should be gun free. I can see why you made the argument. But it needs to be logically looked at as to why these places are gun free. A bank: well, should I even say. Banks can be robbed. Which is why an official armed guard should be on the premises at all times till close. That will at least slow robbers down a bit so the alarm can be activated. Allowing weapons to be carried in only
  49. obama-the-sjw liked this
  50. obama-the-sjw reblogged this from lavelle1215