its-ya-boi-adam said: Happen if a teacher were to fly off the handle at a student and brandish said firearm as a way to threaten said child. Another extreme example but why take the chance. Clubs: these are gun free for a very smart reason. Do you really want a building full of rowdy drunk and uncontrollable people to be brandishing and carrying loaded firearms. If anything letting them have guns would only increase violence.
its-ya-boi-adam said: Invites more people making it easier to get closer to the counter or do more damage. Now onto school zones: you want to arm children? Children? A lot of people actually want this. Now. Maybe someone else’s kid is not well behaved and decides “this other kid took my toy, I should shoot him” granted that’s an extreme example but why even take the chance. Now teachers on the other hand. That’s a double edged sword. There are great teachers out there but God knows what would
its-ya-boi-adam said: And finally onto people stating that gun free zones are the issue and that no place should be gun free. I can see why you made the argument. But it needs to be logically looked at as to why these places are gun free. A bank: well, should I even say. Banks can be robbed. Which is why an official armed guard should be on the premises at all times till close. That will at least slow robbers down a bit so the alarm can be activated. Allowing weapons to be carried in only
its-ya-boi-adam said: No questions asked or background checks. By my own experience purchasing a handgun for home protection, the background check consists of typing my name into the FBI’S top most wanted list or in some cases, just looking at me and making a quick judment. I understand this is not the case in a lot of different states. But still mandatory ACTUAL background checks should be in place. If you’re not a criminal then it won’t affect you.
its-ya-boi-adam said: I love america. I never won’t. But that doesn’t mean I’m not disappointed with where the state of affairs and priorities are. I agree our amendments and rights should not be taken. But not many people truly want to take your guns. The actual logical people understand this is infringement of your second amendment. But making it harder for the criminals to obtain a weapon is better. In Ohio where I live. You can go into a gun show and buy a high powered rifle.
its-ya-boi-adam said: A lot of anti gun control people keep saying that it’s the fact people are obtaining them illegally is the issue. Well yes, and it’s something that’s been stated and approached upon for countless years. To stop illegal containment. We need to check imports. People smuggle these through our border to sell illegally through the black market. “Well border checks would take forever and that’s a hassle”. Then what’s the price to pay to even slightly make this country safer.